369-01-patty.wilde-2024-09-24-09-16-37
Rhetorics of Disability/Accessibility
Prefix and Number: 369.01
Semester and Year: Fall 2025
Number of Credit Hours: 3
Prerequisites: No prerequisites are required for this course.
Course Details
Day and Time: [tbd]
Meeting Location: [tbd]
Instructor Contact Information
Instructor Name: Patty Wilde
Instructor Contact Information: patty.wilde@wsu.edu
Instructor Office Hours: [click here for best practices] [tbd]
Course Description
English 369: Rhetorics of Disability/Composing for Accessibility offers an overview of key issues in disability studies, focusing specifically on the relationship between rhetoric and normative notions of ability and difference. Using a rhetorical lens, students in this class will critically examine models of disability, disability policies, and representations of intersectional “bodyminds.” While rhetoric has the power to shape constructions of normalcy and difference, as we will discuss, it can also be harnessed to challenge traditional views of disability. Exploring these how counter-narratives have been employed to advance disability justice, we will investigate the ways personal stories, in particular, have disrupted stigmas and overturned exclusive policies. As we explore the rhetorical dimensions of disability/accessibility, students will also work to cultivate a culture of access within their own communities, undertaking a series of projects that identify inaccessible spaces, places, and practices while concurrently honing their own inclusive composing and presentation skills.
Course Materials
Books:
Lorde, Audre. The Cancer Journals (any edition is fine).
Wong, Alice, editor. Disability Visibility: First-Person Stories From The Twentieth-Century, Vintage, 2020.
Other Materials: All readings outside of the book selections are located in Canvas.
Course Learning Outcomes (students will be able to:) |
Activities Supporting the Learning Outcomes |
Assessment of the Learning Outcomes |
Use Rhetorical Lens to Theorize and Understand Constructions of Dis/Ability: Identify, define, and describe models of disability, articulating how they rhetorically construction perspectives of disability |
Lecture, readings, class discussion/activities, reading notes |
Assessment of reading notes, student presentation, research project, reflection |
Evaluate Representation: Assess how disability is rhetorically portrayed in various media forms and the effects of these representations on public perceptions and stereotypes |
Lecture, readings, class discussion/activities, reading notes, student presentations |
Assessment of reading notes, student presentation, research project, reflection |
Apply Intersectional Analysis: Explore the intersections of disability with other social identities (such as race, gender, and class) and analyze how these intersections affect experiences of discrimination and privilege |
Lecture, readings, class discussion/activities, reading notes |
Assessment of reading notes, accessibility practice assignments, student presentation, access guide, research project, reflection |
Demonstrate Understanding of Accessibility Principles: Articulate key principles of accessibility in writing, including the importance of clear language, inclusive content, and diverse representation
|
Lecture, readings, class discussion/activities, reading notes |
Assessment of reading notes, accessibility practice assignments, student presentation, access guide, research project, reflection |
Develop Accessible Composing Practices: produce written work that reflects diverse perspectives and is sensitive to issues of equity, representation, and inclusion |
Lecture, readings, class discussion/activities, reading notes |
Accessibility practice assignments, student presentation, access guide, research project |
Identify and Reduce Barriers in Content: critically evaluate texts for accessibility barriers, offering suggestions for improvements regarding clarity and inclusivity
|
Lecture, readings, class discussion/activities, reading notes |
Accessibility practice assignments, student presentation, access guide, research project, relfection |
Dates | Lesson Topic | Assignment | Assessment |
---|---|---|---|
Week 1 |
Introduction to Rhetorics of Disability and Composing for Accessibility I am Not Your Inspiration”—Stella Young https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K9Gg164Bsw Disability as Methodology |
Read:
“James C. Wilson and Cynthia Lewiecki-Wilson’s “Disability, Rhetoric, and the Body” Jule Avril Minich, “Enabling Whom? Critical Disability Studies Now” Sami Schalk, “Critical Disability Studies as Methodology” Write: Reading Notes One |
Reading Notes One |
Week 2 |
Representations of Disability across Bodyminds Centering Access Accessible Presentations Accessible Typography Sign up for DV Presentations |
Read:
Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, "Disability, Identity, and Representation” from Extraordinary Bodies Eli Clare, "Gawking, Gaping, Staring" Jay Dolmage, “An Archive and Anatomy of Disability Myths” from Disability Rhetoric Introduction to Disability Visibility (Wong) Access is Love Project and Access is Love Reading List Aimi Hamraie, “Beyond Accommodation: Disability, Feminist Philosophy, and the Design of Everyday Academic Life” Composing Access: https://u.osu.edu/composingaccess/before-the-presentation/ Write: Reading Notes Two |
Reading Notes Two |
Week 3 |
In/Visible Disabilities Americans with Disabilities Act Access Guides Introduce Access Guide Assignment |
Read: Review CCCC Accessibility Guide and RAMP Ruth Osorio, “Documenting Barriers, Transforming Academic Cultures” Michelle Maroto and David Pettinicchio, “Twenty-Five Years After the ADA” Margaret Price, “Listening to the Subject of Mental Disability” from Mad at School Remi Yergeau, “Clinically Significant Disturbance” Katie Rose Guest Pryal, “Anxiety in Academia” and “Population Shock Events” from A Light in the Tower Brenda Jo Brueggemann, et al. “Becoming Visible: Lessons in Disability” Write: Reading Notes Three |
Reading Notes Three |
Week 4 |
Disability and Language Disability in Our Communities and Coalition Building Captions and Image Description Speech-to-Text Software |
Read:
Jay Dolmage, “Disability Studies of Rhetoric,” from Disability Rhetoric Sami Schalk, “Coming to Claim Crip” Katie Rose Guest Pryal, “How to Talk about Mental Disability” from A Light in the Tower Simi Linton, "Reassigning Meaning" “Writing Respectfully: Person-First and Identity-First Language,” National Institutes of Health Margaret Price and Erin Kathleen Bahl, “The Rhetoric of Description” “Guidelines for Creating Image Descriptions” and “Accessible Text” Write: Reading Notes Four Accessible Writing Practice: Captioning Images |
Reading Notes Four Accessible Writing Practice: Captioning Images |
Week 5 |
Intersectional Identities Video Transcriptions Writing for Screen Readers |
Read:
Alison Kafer, “Imagined Futures” from Feminist, Queer, Crip Nirmala Erevelles and Andrea Minear, “Unspeakable Offenses” Jasbir Puar, “Bodies with New Organs” from The Right to Maim Write: Reading Notes Five |
Reading Notes Five |
Week 6 |
In-Class Workshop: Access Guide Usability and Accessibility Testing Student/Teacher Conferences |
Write: First Draft of Access Guide Meet: Conference with Me to Discuss Your Guide |
First Draft of Access Guide Conference with Me (Part of First Draft Grade) |
Week 7 |
Trauma and Wellness Writing Introduce Final Research Project |
Read:
Angela Carter, “When Silence Said Everything” James Pennebaker, "Telling Stories: The Health Benefits of Narrative" Audre Lorde’s The Cancer Journals Write: Reading Notes Six Final Draft of Access Guide |
Reading Notes Six Final Draft of Access Guide |
Week 8 |
Representations of Disability in the Archive Artifacts from Oregon's Dammasch Mental Hospital Transcribing Videos |
Read:
Jay Dolmage, “Rhetorical Histories of Disability” from Disability Rhetoric Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, "Staring: How We Look" Sara White, "Crippling the Archive" Oregon State University Disability Archives Resource Chad Iwertz and Ruth Osorio, “Composing Captions” Write: Reading Notes Seven Accessible Writing Practice: Transcribing Videos |
Reading Notes SevenAccessible Writing Practice: Transcribing Videos |
Week 9 |
Universal Design for Learning in Higher Education Accessibility and Social Media |
Read: Thomas Tobin and Kirsten Behling, “How Universal Design for Learning Got to Higher Education” and “It’s the Law…Except When It Isn’t” from Reach Everyone, Teach Everyone Jay Dolmage, “Universal Design: Places to Start” Tanya Titchkosky, “Access as an Act of Perception” from The Question of Access Ada Hubrig, “Beyond (Favor) Access: Constellating Communities through Collective Access” Margaret Price, “The Cost of Access” from CripSpaceTime Accessibility and Social Media Write: Reading Notes Eight Accessible Writing Practice: Writing Social Media Posts |
Reading Notes Eight Accessible Writing Practice: Writing Social Media Posts |
Week 10 |
In-Class Workshop: Project Development Student/Teacher Conferences |
Write: Project Proposal Meet: Conference with Me to Discuss Your Proposal |
Research Proposal Conference with Me (Part of Proposal Grade) |
Week 11 |
Disability and the (Writing) Classroom |
Read:
Jay Dolmage, “Mapping Composition: Inviting Disability in the Front Door” Tara Wood et al., “Moving Beyond Disability 2.0 in the Composition Classroom” Deb Martin, “Add Disability and Stir” Tara Wood, “Cripping Time” Remi Yergeau et al., “Disability & Kairotic Spaces” Write: Reading Notes Nine Accessible Writing Practice: Assessing Website Accessibility |
Reading Notes Nine Accessible Writing Practice: Assessing Website Accessibility |
Week 12 |
Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going |
Read:
Alison Kafer, “Accessible Futures, Future Coalitions” from Feminist, Queer, Crip Eli Clare, excerpts from Brilliant Imperfection Leah Lakshmi-Piepzna-Samarasinha, excerpts from Care Work Write: Reading Notes Ten |
Reading Notes Ten |
Week 13 |
In-Class Workshop: Research Development Student/Teacher Conferences |
Write: Research Essay First Draft Meet: Conference with Me to Discuss Your Research |
Research Essay First Draft Conference with Me (Part of Grade for First Draft) |
Week 14 |
In-Class Workshop: Re-Mediated Project |
Compose: Digital Re-mediation of Your Research Draft | Digital Re-mediation of Your Research Draft |
Week 15 |
Multimedia Project Presentations |
Write: Final Essay and Multimedia Project |
Final Essay and Multimedia Project |
Expectations for Student Effort
For this upper-division English course, students should expect to spend a minimum of 9-10 hours per week outside of class engaged in activities including, but not limited to: reading, listening to/viewing media, completing writing assignments and reviewing instructor feedback, contributing to discussions, and conducting research.
Grading
Type of Assignment (tests, papers, etc) | Points | Percent of Overall Grade |
---|---|---|
Reading Notes (20 points @ 10) | 200 | 20% |
Accessible Writing Practice Assignments (20 points @5) |
100 | 10% |
Disability Visability Presentation | 100 | 10% |
Accessibility Guide | 200 | 20% |
Research Proposal | 50 | 5% |
Research Essay |
200 | 20% |
Re-Mediation Project |
100 | 10% |
Course Reflection |
50 | 5% |
Grade | Percent | Grade | Percent |
---|---|---|---|
A |
94-100% |
C |
74-76.9% |
A- |
90-93.9% |
C- |
70-73.9% |
B+ |
87-89.9% |
D+ |
65-69.9% |
B |
84-86.9% |
D |
61-64.9% |
B- |
80-83.9% |
F |
Below 61% |
C+ |
77-79.9% |
WSU Grading Standards
The grading for ENGL 101 follows WSU standards:
A: Outstanding achievement-awarded only for the highest accomplishment
B: Praiseworthy performance-above average in most respects
C: Satisfactory performance-work meets the standards for competency
D: Minimally passing-effort and achievement less than satisfactory.
Attendance and Make-Up Policy
Since we only meet twice a week, you should not miss more than four class meetings in total. I do understand, though, that there might be circumstances beyond your control. Please be in touch if you need special accommodations that warrant an exception to the attendance policy.
Being absent does not excuse you from the responsibility of meeting due dates and deadlines; it also does not excuse you from knowing the material presented in class that day. If you must miss class, it is your responsibility to get the assignments, class notes, and course changes from a classmate. It is also your responsibility to keep track of and complete the missing work.
Please reach out to me to discuss any assignments that you will not be able to submit on time. Because some activities require the participation of all students, I generally do not accept late first drafts, peer workshop responses, or late presentations except in the most urgent of circumstances. Failure to complete these particular assignments by the deadline will often result in a zero. I will accept all other assignments within one week of the original deadline; the penalty is contingent upon the circumstances.
Academic Integrity Statement
You are responsible for reading WSU's Academic Integrity Policy, which is based on Washington State law. If you cheat in your work in this class you will:
-Fail the assignment in question
-Be reported to the Center for Community Standards
-Have the right to appeal my decision
-Not be able to drop the course of withdraw from the course until the appeals process is finished
If you have any questions about what you can and cannot do in this course, ask me.
If you want to ask for a change in my decision about academic integrity, use the form at the Center for Community Standards website. You must submit this request within 21 calendar days of the decision.