SpMgt-365-tammycr-2025-12-01-10-21-20
Below is a syllabus template that includes WSU's required syllabus elements.
Ethical and Moral Reasoning in Sport [M]
SpMgt 365
Spring 2027
3 Credit Hours
Prerequisites: Admitted to the major or minor in Sport Management.
Course Details
Day and Time: [tbd]
Meeting Location: [tbd]
Instructor Contact Information
Instructor Name: [tbd]
Instructor Contact Information: [office location, phone, email] [tbd]
Instructor Office Hours: [click here for best practices] [tbd]
TA Name: [tbd]
TA Contact Information: [office location, phone, email]: [tbd]
TA Office Hours: [click here for best practices] [tbd]
Course Description
365 [M] Ethics and Moral Reasoning in Sport 3 Course Prerequisite: Admitted to the major or minor in Sport Management. Understanding and application of ethical theory and principles of moral reasoning to the analysis of issues and dilemmas in sport.
Writing in the Major [M]
This course carries the [M] course tag, meaning it is a Writing in the Major Course approved by the WSU Writing Program. [M] courses make writing assignments central to the work of the course and emphasize revision processes, to help students explore the knowledge of a particular discipline and to create and share that knowledge. The case study reflections described in the assignment section satisfy the [M] requirement.
Course Materials
Books: Simon, R. L., Torres, C. R., & Hager, P. (2014). Fair Play: The Ethics of Sport (4th Ed). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN: 978-0-8133-4920-6 (est. $30 used)
Other Materials: None
Fees: None
|
Course Learning Outcomes (students will be able to:) |
Activities Supporting the Learning Outcomes | Assessment of the Learning Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
|
Assigned Readings, Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Code of Ethics Application | Reading Quizzes, Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Code of Ethics Application, Final Exam |
|
Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections | Reading Quizzes, Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Final Exam |
|
Assigned Readings, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections |
Reading Quizzes, Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Code of Ethics Application, Final Exam |
|
Assigned Readings, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections |
Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections |
|
Assigned Readings, Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Code of Ethics Application |
Reading Quizzes, Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Code of Ethics Application, Final Exam |
|
Assigned Readings, Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Code of Ethics Application |
Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Code of Ethics Application, Final Exam |
|
Assigned Readings, Code of Ethics Application |
Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Code of Ethics Application, Final Exam |
|
Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Final Exam |
Reading Quizzes, Personal Values Reflection, Discussion Sessions, Case Study Written Reflections, Code of Ethics Application, Final Exam |
| Dates | Lesson Topic | Assignment | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Week 1 Thurs |
Introduction and Course Requirements What is Ethics? |
||
| Week 2 Tues Thurs |
Ethical Theory Moral + Character Education |
Text – p. 1-5, 21-37 |
Reading Quiz 1 Personal Values Reflection |
| Week 3 Tues Thurs |
Moral + Character Education Discussion 1 |
Text – p. 5-18, 219-228 In-class Discussion |
Reading Quiz 2 Discussion 1 |
| Week 4 Tues Thurs |
Ethical Dilemmas and Decision-Making Ethical Dilemmas and Decision-Making cont'd
|
Text – p. 228-237 |
Reading Quiz 3
|
| Week 5 Tues Thurs |
Sportsmanship/Gamesmanship Discussion 2 |
Text – p. 37-54, 71-78 In-class Discussion |
Reading Quiz 4 Discussion 2 |
| Week 6 Tues Thurs |
Competitive Ethics Discussion 3 |
Discussion 3 |
Discussion 3 |
| Week 7 Tues Thurs |
Competitive Ethics Discussion 4 |
Discussion 4 |
Discussion 4 |
| Week 8 Tues Thurs |
Performance Enhancement Performance Enhancement cont'd |
Text – p. 59-71, 81-111 |
Reading Quiz 5 Case Study Reflection 1 |
| Week 9 Tues Thurs |
The Issue of Fairness (Justice) Discussion 5 |
Text – p. 127-155 Discussion 5 |
Reading Quiz 6 Discussion 5 |
| Week 10 Tues Thurs |
Who’s Social Responsibility? Discussion 6 |
Text - p. 111-123, 206-217, 237-242 Discussion 6 |
Reading Quiz 7 Discussion 6 |
| Week 11 Tues Thurs |
The Academic/Athletic Dilemma The Academic/Athletic Dilemma cont'd |
Text – p. 157-168 |
Reading Quiz 8 Case Study Reflection 3 |
| Week 12 Tues Thurs |
The Academic/Athletic Dilemma cont'd Discussion 7 |
Text – p. 169-185 Discussion 7 |
Reading Quiz 9 Discussion 7 |
| Week 13 Tues Thurs |
The Sport and Money Problem Discussion 8 |
Text – p. 189-206 Discussion 8 |
Reading Quiz 10 Discussion 8 |
| Week 14 Tues Thurs |
Code of Ethics Code of Ethics Application
|
Code of Ethics Application | Code of Ethics Application |
| Week 15 Tues Thurs |
Case Study Reflection 4 Final Exam Review |
Case Study Reflection 4 |
Case Study Reflection 4 Final Exam, Week 16, via Canvas |
Expectations for Student Effort
Anticipate dedicating around nine hours each week to course-related tasks. This includes three hours of designated class time and an additional six hours for independent work beyond the classroom. Activities outside of class include reading, reviewing class materials, working collaboratively with group members, completing assignments, and preparing for tests.
It is expected that all students present on a given day be attentive, polite, and not a source of distraction to the instructor or any other student. Students engaged in distracting or disruptive behaviors (e.g., visiting with your neighbor, talking on cell phones or other communication devices) will be asked to leave the classroom.
Grading
| Type of Assignment (tests, papers, etc) | Points | Percent of Overall Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Reading Quizzes (10x10) | 100 | 18% |
| Personal Values Reflection | 25 | 4% |
| Discussion Sessions (8) | 140 | 25% |
| Case Study Written Reflections (4x50) | 200 | 35% |
| Code of Ethics Application (1x) | 50 | 9% |
| Final Exam | 50 | 9% |
| TOTAL | 565 | 100% |
| Grade | Percent | Grade | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| A |
92.5–100% |
C | 72.5–76.4% |
| A- | 90–92.4% | C- | 70–72.4% |
| B+ | 86.5–89.9% | D+ | 66.5–69.9% |
| B | 82.5–86.4% | D | 60–66.4% |
| B- | 80–82.4% | F | 59.9-0% |
| C+ | 76.5–79.9% |
Attendance and Make-Up Policy
It is your responsibility to attend class. Daily roll call will not be taken. However, you will be graded on in-class activities. Students who are absent for in-class activities will not be allowed to make up the points, except in the case of a University-approved absence or absence related to civic duty (jury duty or military activity).
All assignments are due on the date given on the syllabus; otherwise, a score of zero will be recorded. Consideration for acceptance of late work due to extenuating circumstances will be made on a case-by-case basis.
Academic Integrity Statement
Washington State University, a community dedicated to advancing knowledge, expects all students to adhere to high standards of scholarship and the Standards of Conduct for Students. Students are expected to understand the meaning of academic integrity and to adhere to the University’s policies on academic integrity. All members of the university community (and this class) share responsibility for maintaining and promoting the principles of integrity in all activities, including academic integrity and honest scholarship.
Any form of academic dishonesty (including but not limited to cheating, plagiarism, unauthorized collaboration, falsification, and misrepresentation) is not tolerated, and violation of the policy will incur the consequences outlined below.
As a student, you are responsible for reading WSU’s Academic Integrity Policy, which is based on Washington State law. Academic integrity will be strongly enforced in this course. Students who violate WSU’s Academic Integrity Policies (identified in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 504-26-010(3) and WAC 504-26-404 will, on the first offense, receive a zero for the assignment and receive one full letter grade lower as a final grade for the semester (from an A to a B, etc.). A second violation will result in an “F” grade for the course. Students suspected of an academic integrity violation will be reported to the Center for Community Standards. Students may appeal to the Center for Community Standards, but will not have the option to drop or withdraw from the course until the appeals process is complete. If you have any questions about what you can and cannot do in this course, ask me.
For more information on responding to academic integrity violations, please visit: https://www.handbook.wsu.edu/academic-integrity-process/. Please contact the Center for Community Standards for more specific information about the process. The Center for Community Standards can be reached at 509-335-4532 or community.standards@wsu.edu.
If you want to ask for a change in my decision about academic integrity, use the form at the Center for Community Standards website. You must submit this request within 21 calendar days of the decision.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
Use AI to generate ideas and edit your work. Synthesize content from AI with your writing to align AI-generated content with course material. By itself, AI-generated content is not original work. Therefore, treat AI to generate content like a source (i.e. journal article, blog post, book, or website) and provide a citation. Provide quotations if the text is a direct (word-for-word) replica of the content generated in AI or if you have revised or paraphrased the material. Your ability to produce original work is a requirement in this course and failure to provide appropriate citations for AI-generated content may result in a zero on the assignment.
To cite AI in APA format, use the following approach*:
- APA format: OpenAI. (Year). ChatGPT (Month Day version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com\
- APA reference entry: OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Feb 13 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
- APA in-text citation: (OpenAI, 2023)
*Source - OWL at Purdue: https://guides.lib.purdue.edu/c.php?g=1371380&p=10135074
** For additional information: https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt